Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Pichler vs Pietro Marino Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pichler vs Marino analysis and find out who is favored!
David Pichler vs Pietro Marino Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pichler 1 - 2 Marino
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pichler has won 50.64% of points on his second serve, while Marino has won 49.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pichler, in recent form, has won 55.28% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marino has won 51.75%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.42% and 37.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pichler has saved 58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marino has saved 53.8% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pichler has won 46.03% of matches played (W/L 29/ 34), with Marino winning 53.23% (W/L 33/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pichler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 121/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Marino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Pichler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 20/ 20), where as Marino has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.23% of matches (W/L 33/ 29). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Pichler winning 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Pichler winning 4 and Marino winning 4. The last match between Pichler and Marino was at the M15 Dubrovnik, 18-04-2024, Second, Clay with Pietro Marino getting the victory 6-4 2-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pichler and Marino have played a deciding set 2 times, with Pichler winning 0 times and Marino 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Pichler winning 0, and Marino 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pichler has played against opponents with an average rank of 196.92 while Marino has played against players with an average rank of 123.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pichler has won 27% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marino has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pichler has converted 46.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marino has converted 38.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pichler 1 - 2 Marino
561
Rank
390
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
1
Hard1
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
841
Rank
827
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
56% (342-267)
Career Total W/L
58% (122-88)
43% (9-12)
YTD W/L
54% (14-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | David Pichler | Pietro Marino |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 4 |
| Games Won | 39 | 35 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:0 | 2:7:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (161/240) | 63% (159/251) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (108/161) | 68% (108/159) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (45/79) | 48% (44/92) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (10/22) | 38% (8/21) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (99/251) | 36% (87/240) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 2-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Pietro Marino
Player
David Pichler
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
| 0-6 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
David Pichler
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Pietro Marino
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Pichler | Pietro Marino |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (9/12) | 54% (14/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (25/23) | 54% (31/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (221/213) | 54% (274/237) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) | 54% (14/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 64 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 59 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:53 | 1:28:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 260.33 | 178.46 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (871/1388) | 63% (818/1295) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (592/871) | 61% (500/818) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (258/517) | 49% (235/477) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (58/130) | 41% (71/175) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (559/1402) | 43% (593/1372) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 44% (4/5) | 54% (14/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (9/19) | 56% (14/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 100% (13/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 0% (13/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 8% (13/1) |
David Pichler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
David Pichler
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve %
54%
(
14 of
26)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
56%
(
5 of
9)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
16
Total Points Won
20
|
2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
David Pichler
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
David Pichler
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
David Pichler
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
David Pichler
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
11
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
David Pichler
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Christian Langmo
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Pietro Marino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
Player
Pietro Marino
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve %
77%
(
20 of
26)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
22
Total Points Won
14
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Furlanetto
Player
Pietro Marino
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
Leonardo Iemmi
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Pietro Marino
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
Marco Berti
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Pietro Marino
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
David Pichler
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pichler Vs Marino Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
